With this in mind, the book is organized into three broad Overview of the most current research, and offering constructive suggestions inĭealing with the subject matter more accurately. Identifying the most spurious myths on a given topic, providing a broad Testament” and, “We have a first-century manuscript of the Gospel of Mark.” ToĪddress these and other concerns, the contributors follow a general pattern of Most common myths include: “There may be as many as 400,000 variants in the New Information, abused statistics, and the selective use of evidence. Myths and mistakes can generally be classified into three groups: outdated In the Introduction, Hixson and Gurry indicate that the Hixson and Gurry, along with a team of New Testament textual critics, address these concerns head-on by providing a much-needed corrective for scholars and apologists alike. The upshot of the current predicament is that “the Bible is discredited by the very people who think they are defending it” (20). Gurry (assistant professor of New Testament and co-director of the Text & Canon Institute at Phoenix Seminary) point out that the renewed interest in apologetics has created a fresh host of problems-a proliferation of myths, mistakes, and misinformation that has surfaced from a very technical discipline within the field of biblical studies. While Ehrman’s skepticism about the text of the New Testament deserves a thorough response, Elijah Hixson (junior research associate in New Testament Text and Language at Tyndale House, Cambridge) and Peter J. Since the startling popularity of Bart Ehrman’s bestselling Misquoting Jesus (2005), the discipline of textual criticism has been wedged in the crossroads between New Testament studies and Christian apologetics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |